Friday, October 19, 2012

A Parental Visit

Parents worry. It's what we do. They do. I saw mine last night in NY for dinner. We were celebrating my mom's 70th birthday. It's been a while since we've all been together. Their visits have waned of late. Not sure why. A minor tiff with my brother? Wanting to be asked more? Just busy? Not 100% sure really. And of course, I haven't exactly made the effort to get back to Philadelphia lately with my kids. In between all the work travel, getting on a plane to use up well earned vacation days in Philly is not my idea of a good time. We went to Maui instead. I'd invited my mom but she declined. It's a long flight. I can't leave your father for that long. Blah blah blah. It's Hawaii! C'mon!

Dinner was nice. We talked politics. They've become more staunchly liberal in hating Mr. Romney; in the face of Mr. Mormon their love of Obama has grown. Mine too. They are disgusted by the rampant and palpable racism that seems to drive Republican pundits' hatred of the President (go Mom and Dad!) They are proud in their non-racism, proud (as they should be) to defend a smart black man who looks a heck of a lot like their grandkids will when they grow up.

We also talked about Sandusky (ew...bad dude) and the relationship between THAT pedophile and the ones from my own sport. Did we have any culpability in not turning them in? Yes. I'd say so. I was a kid bordering on adulthood. I wish I'd done more.

We talked about movies. (See Argo, don't see The Master.)

Most notably they welled with tears upon my just sitting down at the table. It's been too long. I am happy. There are developments in my life - love, primarily - that they haven't appropriately shared in but are thrilled about nonetheless. They were clearly worried about me before; and maybe aren't so much anymore. I have someone that will take care of my heart. What parent doesn't want that for their kid?




Sunday, October 14, 2012

To Share or Not To Share

I've always been kind of a sharer. Perhaps an over-sharer - with my friends at least. And I suppose even with strangers. I will admit I'm not always the best at sharing with my partner (hate that word but can't locate another at the moment). That's not what this is about though. More on that in another post. Suffice it to say there are a whole host of reasons why sharing in love has become quite difficult for me though I am fighting like hell to reveal my most over-sharing transparent self in my relationship. Back to my point...

Privacy has never been a major concern. It's just not something I think about a ton. I don't mind not having much of it. I give up a great deal of it willingly, every day. When I was writing my book there were more than a few moments when I took pause and said to myself: I probably shouldn't share this. It's humiliating... or It's ugly. Not a side of myself I want to show.

But I came to the conclusion that the ugliest parts, the most shameful bits, were the parts that I most had to lean into. To share with the most honesty. I find salvation, communion when others share their darkest moments. I inhale memoirs to find these tidbits. It is in Mary Karr's Lit or Caroline Knapp's Drinking A Love Story (despite this list I don't actually have a drinking problem) or listening to Brene Brown talk about her own battles with shame that I find connection. And I feel less ashamed. Less alone. So I figure if I can do this, others who read what I write (no matter how few) will connect and their own shame may dissipate. And I write about personal stuff because it helps to dissolve my own gut ripping self-reproach and gloom. It's as if the air hitting the words diminishes the sharpness of the thing itself.

And so it's just become second nature. To share. To over share. I've paused at times and thought to myself: can this put me in a bad position professionally? Perhaps. The people I work with, for, near may not think highly of a serial blabbermouth. But I said to myself long ago, if anyone wants to banish me for attempting to become a half way not shitty writer, for revealing things that matter to me, that hurt me, that make me joyful, then I suppose I need to rethink my profession. If writing stuff is as important to me as my career, then I should be able to do both at the same time. And I am oh so grateful that I have been afforded that opportunity.

As I was talking to a colleague the other day she was telling me she'd quit Facebook due to privacy concerns. She didn't want work friends friending her. She didn't want everyone knowing everything. She didn't want Facebook knowing everything. I get it. But it's so not me. I stopped in my tracks for a moment to rethink my approach. Am I crazy? Where are my boundaries? What kind of narcissistic exhibitionist puts it all out there, all the time?

I suppose I'll regret it one day - and I have at times when I've "over-shared" something that wasn't necessarily mine to share - but I think any regret will be minor and fairly recoverable. It's a purposeful choice to live my life in this way, to share my thoughts to dissipate the shame. And it works for me.

I'm not talking about posting pictures on Facebook. Who cares. I like to post them so my mom can see what's happening with my kids. I'm talking about sharing all the icky stuff. The sheer panic of being alone for the first time in my adult life. The desperate loneliness of not seeing my kids from Sunday to Tuesday and being terrified they will never want to return to me. The nearly intolerable blackness that overwhelms upon ending a marriage despite knowing it's the right thing to do. The piercing self-disgust of knowing I didn't do it in the right way, if there can be one. Writing about all this stuff makes it a little less hard. A little less frenzied and frantic and devastating and miserable.

Upon thinking this through - again - I feel reaffirmed in this choice for myself. And I find myself in a bit of a conundrum as I embark on a new life with someone who values his privacy, our privacy above most things. I love that he feels this way. He cherishes the moments we have as ours and ours alone. But I find myself at a loss for words as I sit down here now because I don't want to violate his sense of privacy to share my own happy, my own angst, my own anything because what's mine is ours now. But I still want to share. Something.

I will re-navigate these waters. I will find the right balance. I won't violate his trust. But I will find a way to use this approach that works for me, this telegraphing of emotion to free myself of humiliation and remorse, this sharing that softens the edges of my own dark moments, this self-centered amplification of my joy... I'll work it out. We'll work it out. Together we will balance his need for privacy with my chronic urgent compulsion to blab.




Wednesday, October 10, 2012

Reuniting

This past weekend was my 20th college reunion. At the risk of sounding, well - like everyone, I can't believe college happened 20 years ago. I've been to every reunion so far seeing as I live fairly close to campus. A quick 40 minute drive provides no reason NOT to go. And I loved college. For me, college was a turning point. It was for many, I know. But for me, it was the first time I was not a gymnast. I met people with varied interests. I was perceived as someone who could do things other than flip. I developed an identity that would be more me than the one I already had.

I loved seeing everyone this weekend. I've stayed in touch with many friends since then. But we are never all together. What a treat.

I still consider the friends I made at Stanford some of my best. I was privileged to have met some of the most interesting people I know, to this day. Smart, ambitious, kind, funny. June who runs the Ted Conference. Alex who writes New Yorker cartoons and other more widely seen and read commercial things. What a group!

And what luck that they let me in to this bastion of intellectual endeavor (the #1 university the year I was admitted), in all likelihood because I was good at doing tricks on the balance beam. Not that kind of tricks. A more altogether useless kind.

I waited every day to be found out. To be identified as the mistake. To have some official come knocking at my door and say: I'm sorry. We're going to have to ask you to leave. You are simply not smart enough to be here. Somehow I escaped that fate by secretly studying when everyone else (in the Humanities) seemed to skate by. People in pre-Med studied. People in Engineering studied. But not people in Communications (what's that?!) or Political Science (my two inauspicious majors - I added a second out of sheer fear of being lame).

The Tuesday night before the weekend of the reunion I saw my first Stanford friend - Lance. He lived in my freshman dorm. We became friends fast. We dated. He came out. It set me up for a life of falling for gay men. We're still friends. Though Lance is the type that is friends with EVERYONE so it is always hard to know where you stand. Am I an acquaintance? Am I the BFF? Does it matter?

Here's us with the (my) boyfriend:

Daniel, the boyfriend, is the brother of a fellow Stanford-ite. My class. He came with me to all the festivities perhaps thinking that there might be a person or two he'd know from having visited. That turned out to not really be true but he was a good sport, smiled and met everyone. And read a book when it all got too boring. I can't imagine how boring it was to watch me ... "Hi! [hug] How are you? Where do you live these days? How many kids? Ok I see _______! Gotta go!" But he did it. With a smile.

This guy is a keeper. As everyone noted.

I spent Friday night and most of Saturday with "my girls". We talked, we laughed, we made a little fun. We investigated the passings of the short list of those identified as no longer with us. Not uncommonly, I suppose, a large percentage of the deceased died by suicide. I guess at this age, what could still be considered "early death", accidents and suicides are often the cause.

We were grateful to all be together. They loved Daniel, of course. And this part - the more intimate part with "the girls" - was conceivably less boring for him as these ladies know his brother. We were "of a group" - one of the ladies having actually dated the brother. Yes it's all very weird. But makes sense in a karmic kind of way.

There were many locals in attendance. We promised to hang out soon. We may. We may not. I will inevitably continue to see the ones I see and talk to already. Sweet Rae. June of Ted fame. Lance, my first gay. Fraize, when I visit Chicago which I assume will happen more now (more than never) as Daniel's parents live there.

I have no grand point to make here other than to say I love my friends. Stanford provided me with the opportunity to meet some truly remarkable people. I'm honored that they let me in and that these fine folks have opted to stay friends with me through thick and thin.

On a side note, divorce was not an uncommon theme at this reunion. I suppose it's the time. Many married in their early thirties. We're in our early forties. Ten years? If it's not gonna work it is time to call it. The admission was often met with an almost congratulatory tone. The tone of those that know that marriage can be hard. And sometimes it's too hard for it to be right or worth it. I'm in awe of those who still make it work. Good pickin'.

Sunday, August 12, 2012

So Long Olympics

I thought I'd have something to say about the Olympics. But I don't. I strained to find something to say. I watched. The Fab Five were Fab. McKayley Maroney should have behaved better but she didn't. She's just a kid. Oh well. I have no issue with the Flying Squirrel's hair. Who cares about her hair? She defies gravity. I have no beef with Usain Bolt for his perceived arrogance or confidence or misguided means of celebrating. Whatever it is.

They are athletes. They have superior physical capabilities. Sometimes the foolish ones come to believe they are superior humans but they learn with time. The humble ones are grateful and will go on to do interesting things beyond athletics, lead fulfilling interesting lives. Some will struggle to find out what's next. Some will capitalize on their star stature. Most won't because there won't be anything to capitalize on. "I went to the Olympics for archery." ; "Oh" ; "Yeah"... doesn't get you much really. Though it should always bring a tremendous sense of pride. And I suppose it will.

I don't think they're heroes. I don't think they make history as is oft uttered by the commentators. (Except maybe those two black power track guys from back in the day.)

Tommie Smith and John Carlos
at the '68 Olympics

They have remarkable physical aptitudes, unrelenting tenacity, endurance beyond what most can fathom. The ones that win, the ones that don't. Even the ones that don't make the Olympics but almost do. What's truly intriguing to consider is what they will do with that perseverance beyond athletics. Anything? I hope so.

They are exceptional athletes. No more. No less. I do love to watch them. I marvel at their grace, strength, persistence and sheer gutsiness.

The closing ceremonies are utterly unwatchable. I'm going to do something productive instead.

Friday, August 3, 2012

Bye bye Khakis

I've been in Mexico City for the last two days with my friends and teammates from Dockers. We've made a habit of having these once a year, get the whole team together sessions and we plan our marketing activities for the upcoming year. Blah blah. Boring work talk.

So this was my third one. The first one was in Madrid and I was moving out of the house I shared with my husband and children upon my return to San Francisco. It was a contentious meeting and I had a horrific experience waiting for me at home. A life altering, sad, devastating cluster fuck. My husband and I would have to tell our children that their parents weren't going to be together anymore, I would have to pack up my shit, I would have to leave the apartment I'd lived in for 8 years and a man I'd lived with for just about 15. Needless to say, that meeting was fairly brutal.

The second one was in NY. We worked better together as a team. I had a year of single-hood under my belt so I didn't feel like crying all the time. We had some fun.

And now the third. I'm happy and in love. These people, this team...they are my friends. They are being recognized in the organization for having done great work and operating like a team. And we got done what we had to for the week in a collaborative manner. We challenged each other but never dismissed each other. We worked quickly but in a well informed smart way. And they wished me farewell (see picture of my gift below) as I move on to my next endeavor.

I'm feeling corny and sentimental! I love these people! And I think, in the words of Sally Field, "You like me. You really like me!"  Unless, of course, they are blowing smoke up my ass which is absolutely a possibility but I'm going to choose to believe that that is not the case.

Goodbye Dockers. Hello internet. I will miss khakis and wearing the pants. Though I'll still be here at Levi Strauss and Company - going on my 14th year!

What a lovely place to find myself. Embraced by my work family. Having done a lot of hard work - both professionally and personally. That has paid off.

Happy girl.

Sunday, July 29, 2012

Pause?

Not terribly active these days on the writing front. I was just about to sit down and write "I'm taking a break from this thing for a bit so I can stop feeling guilty that I'm not writing anything". But then I peeked at the "stats" - something I don't do all that often - and it appears there are people that actually read this. Which I find flabbergasting. But reason enough, perhaps, to try to write something now and again.

I'm a tad torn about continuing for a few reasons:


  1. I started writing this because I was in a death spiral of doom, hence the sub-title by way of explanation: "a don't panic log". At my most anxious and sad and desperate, I found if I wrote down how I was feeling it dissipated enough to muddle through. It was my friend Kristin that suggested this approach and she was right. I could have just gotten a journal, I suppose. But the act of admitting shame and sadness publicly, for me, is what helps normalize it. Keeping it to myself just doesn't work as well. Somehow giving it air brings it down in intensity a notch effectively diffusing the angst and despair. 
  2. I'm no longer in a death spiral of doom. So perhaps the need to do this is no longer there. But maybe I can just make it about something else? Like happiness? Which surely will ebb and flow. 
  3. I say things that are private. Which, when they're just about me is fine. But when they involve other people ... it is not so fine. And I've botched this line on more than one occasion and hurt people I care about. So given that it seems I'm a little unclear on the line (I'm learning), maybe I should just hit pause.
  4. There are people reading this that I had no idea would ever even care. There are people I work with that have referenced it in passing. What? Goodness. Embarrassing. But perhaps OK. I said to myself when I started (thinking no one would ever read it except Kristin who suggested it) that if anything I wrote about got me in trouble at work then that probably wasn't the place for me to work anymore. I don't write about work stuff that is confidential or even sensitive. So why should they care if I write about stuff that is personally confidential and sensitive? Seems to me it isn't their business. And they don't care. Whew. All of that said, it is a little disconcerting to think about colleagues that I sit in status meetings with and do power point presentations to reading the sex entry I wrote a few months back (and have since taken down for a whole host of reasons). Alas... I'm pretty OK with it. 
I'll ponder this for a moment. I'll likely continue as at the very least it keeps my mind limber in a way that my real work does not. The more I write the more I write, I guess. 

And of course, there are these Olympics to comment on... 

Saturday, June 23, 2012

I'm back

I've been away. Took a break from writing this thing. Not on purpose. Life just happens. Lots has happened in the last few weeks. Lets see...

Not at all least important, I had a little health scare (mom - I didn't tell you because I didn't want you to worry). Suffice it to say there were ultrasounds and all manner of pictures taken and scared looking technicians that all resulted in a "You're fine!" prognosis. Whew. I'd convinced myself (while remaining very calm) that it was not going to be good. That I was finally happy - REALLY happy - and so the shoe would now drop. Work is good. I have it all in perspective. I work hard, love the people I work with, have new opportunities, feel respected... can't beat it.

I have a writing opportunity (which I need to hunker down and take advantage of) - I've been asked to write a young adult series about the dark side of gymnastics. I've done some chapters. But I need to speed it up! Agent likes it. All bodes well.

And I fell in love. Madly. Can't write, can't do much of anything but be with him and ponder my good fortune.

I thought I didn't get to have this. I thought: I'm a lucky girl. Great job. Successful. Able to provide for myself and my family in ways I never thought possible. I have two charming, smart, interesting, healthy children - we have fun and we explore and talk and laugh constantly. They can be total pains in the ass too but mostly, they are golden.

I have a "hobby" I love - writing. (Recently my youngest asked me what my hobby was... "Work?" he said...nice) And I've found some success at it. I have beautiful, amazing, large quantities of friends from all the corners of my life - work, gymnastics, college, high school, dance class, San Francisco randoms. Close friends. Kind, invested friends who support me and show up when I need them. As I do for them. I have a terrific family. A brother that can't be beat. Who showed up every day after my divorce and helped me out and hung my television and talked to me and made me food and listened to me cry. And cheered me on. A sister in law who did the same and tolerated a weepy, always around sister in law in the form of me. And two - soon to be three - nephews who squeal my name when I show up... Aunt Jen!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

So I don't get love. Ok. I can be happy anyway. I enjoy my time alone. I love reading and writing and going to movies. I'm on my own, I'm not alone. My mantra. I'm at peace. And I was.

And then there he was. In the wild. Not on-line. I met him at a reading of a mutual friend. Perfect. We both love books. He asked me out. We had a date. That was it. I was done for. Either done dating or serious heartbreak. I didn't admit it to myself right away. How could I? Only crazy people, obsessive romantics, fall in love on the first date. I think I maybe waited til the second date. Patient. Hah.

I never knew that kind and smart - really crazy super duper smart - came in one package. With the right amount of darkness. I thought I had to give up one or the other. Pick, Jen, kind or smart. Which one? I didn't know intensity could happen with calm. In a person or in a relationship.

He wouldn't have made it through my filters on-line. Never married. No kids. I thought these things were important if I expected to be understood. I wouldn't have made it through his either. I was - am - too old. He's not a youth chaser. Just didn't want a 39 year old childless woman desperate to get married and have IVF twins before it was no longer an option.

And yet I've never felt more understood. Life circumstances don't create understanding. It's unaccountable really, what draws people to each other. How they, how we, just know when it is IT.

Every time he says something kind - which is often - I think he's being sarcastic. That's how crazy I am. I'm starting to get used to it though and now I can at least not say, "Are you fucking with me?" every single time he utters a kindness. I can take it in and feel grateful. And feel understood. And loved. Never pressured or controlled. Heard. Taken in. He doesn't want to move the pieces around. He takes them all in - as they are me - and he says: I wouldn't change a thing. I don't need you to want differently, be different, express yourself differently. Just be. It is more than enough for you to just be you. It is everything.

There is nothing he could tell me that would scare me off. And he says some scary shit about the past. Or what would be scary to other gals. It all makes me love him more. Not the stuff itself. The openness. And maybe even the stuff itself. Who knows.

It's unaccountable really, what draws people to each other. And in this big insane world, it is amazing that two people ever meet each other. The confluence of circumstance required for that to happen is remarkable.

Kismet.


Monday, May 28, 2012

A new approach...

Someone once said to me, "if hard ain't working, try easy." I am doing that now. I'm giving in to the natural flow of things. If the water flows there, I will follow. Pushing against the tide has grown tiresome. I used to think, if something wasn't hard it wasn't worthwhile. I'm going to try another way.

I'm going to breathe and be happy. I'm going to do my job and not always wallow in dissatisfaction, pushing my shoulder against the door, trying to get into the next room when the door is, perhaps, locked. Or blocked. Or simply not wanting to open. At least not right now.

I'm not making rules about men. Other than "this feels right" (or conversely, this feels wrong). I'm not on-line dating. It's a push push push world. I'm going to do things I love and perhaps he will appear (perhaps he has already). I am going with the flow. And I think he may be standing right in front of me.

But I'm not doing yoga. No way.

Thursday, May 10, 2012

Little League Shenanigans

My son plays baseball. Not serious baseball. Nine year old coach-pitch baseball. They get the game at this point. They know to throw it to first, to tag the player when he isn't forced to run, they catch the occasional pop up. But it's a mixed bag.

Wyatt on the mound
On Wyatt's team, there are two kids that are pretty phenomenal. They are kind of ridiculous actually. One plays shortstop (and crowds the outfielder and the player on the mound which is usually Wyatt) and the other plays first. They have this play that is as good as any duo on the Giants. The shortstop scoops up the ball, hurls it at lightening fast speed to first, the first baseman catches it (every time) and the batter is out before he's crossed the half way mark between home and first. They nail it time in time out. They're good. Really. It kind of amazes me until I remember the kids I competed with and what they did at just nine years old. But not the point.

Wyatt plays "pitcher" which means he doesn't pitch, but he stands on the mound and once the coach pitches he takes over the role. He does well. He's probably (I say this with all objectivity) tied for 3rd best on the team. But it's a distant third over these other two. These two are going for it. Who knows if they'll make it. But they are serious about the game and I know what that looks like when nine year olds are serious about sports. They may burn themselves out, they may start drinking in high school, they may get injured. But they're running at the pros, and will probably bring in a scholarship at least. The pros are obviously a rarity. Who's to say what will happen there.

Anyway, the shortstop is a tad aggressive. Which is fine. He's good. But he harasses my kid. And I don't like it. He tells Wyatt to back off. To let him get every ball. Wyatt is a quiet kid. I told him to stand up for himself. That he doesn't have to let Mr. big mouth shortstop push him around. I even said: push him back if he touches you. It's ok. I won't be mad.

This past week at practice it got bad. I could see it from the sidelines. Shortstop came at him. He may have actually even pushed him aside physically. Wyatt stood his ground. That's my boy. But the shortstop brought first baseman into the argument. It was 2 on 1. They mocked him.
  • Shortstop said: back up Wyatt. Let me get it. 
  • Wyatt said: But I'm pitcher. I got it. 
  • Shortstop: No really. Hey Mr. First baseman - tell Wyatt to back off. Tell him he's outfield. He's outfield right? 
  • First baseman: Yeah. He's outfield. 
Smug little fuckers. So Wyatt eventually gives up and backs up into outfield. And then when the ball flies into his zone, shortstop pushes him out of the way again. Poor little guy.

He held his own. But he was so flustered that when the ball did come to him, he fumbled. Or whatever it's called in baseball. Then they gave him a whole bunch of shit again about backing off and just letting them handle it. My baby. (I should add, they do miss sometimes, these two. Of course they do. They're 9. Immaturely, I like pointing out to Wyatt when these other kids flub it up. Just to make him see everyone falters.)

He held it together. I should mention the coach saw none of this. He had his back to the whole affair because he was pitching. He isn't neglectful just engaged in organized chaos with the other 10 kids on the team, one of whom hit another with a bat by accident, square in the forehead, flattening him.

The minute we left the field Wyatt broke down. But what a trooper for holding it together for the whole practice. He lost it though, as we made our way to the car. "W-- is an asshole!" Yes that's what he said. I didn't scold him. The kid is kind of an asshole.

I explained that asshole simply thinks that because he is good at baseball that he gets to treat people badly. And that it wasn't right but that he'd learn his lesson one day. I also reminded Wyatt that he is good at many many things and that didn't ever give him the right to be nasty to anyone else or to believe he was somehow better than anyone else. Not that good chess players usually get uppity.

It took a while for him to calm down. A smoothie and some video games later he had it all under control. But he did say he didn't want to go back to baseball.

What to do? I don't give a rat's ass whether or not the child plays baseball. I don't want him to feel bullied on the field. But I also don't want him to give up and hide because someone is a bit salty. People can be dicks. We can't hide from life every time we encounter a random douchebag. Hmm. What's a mother to do?

I called the coach to let him know Wyatt might not be back. Not because he doesn't like the team, he does. But because of Mr. Shortstop. I explained that I wasn't upset with the kid. I get it. Shortstop is good. He wants to win. He's more serious than the other kids. I was that kid. I TOTALLY get it. I don't expect the coach to pretend everyone is equally good. I do expect him to teach them the rules of sportsmanship.

He's a gem, that coach. He said: I want Wyatt to experience a positive team experience. He's a great kid. I made him pitcher because he's reliable, because he's a team player. Get him to the game on Saturday and I'll encourage him. I really don't want him to have a bad experience with this. And I love his hair.

Wyatt's fro

What a guy. By hook or by crook (or maybe a bribe) I'll get him to the game on Saturday. Sometimes it's better when the encouragement doesn't come from mom. I'll let the coach tell him he's got cool hair, a good arm and a team friendly attitude.

Monday, April 30, 2012

More Advice For Grads

Since people seemed to like the advice post (not really my style, was worried it was kinda lame), thought I'd add a few more. Well, I don't know if people liked it, but it got a lot of eyeballs.

Since I'd edited myself down to ten, I figured I'd keep it going. Ten might be a perfect number for a list but it isn't necessarily the perfect number for advice. Here we go:


  1. Be nice to people. Don't burn any bridges. It may feel good in the moment to light a match and set the building on fire when you quit a job, but guess what? You might be interviewing ten years later and be sitting in front of someone who's the best friend of the gal whose cube went up in flames. Keep it to yourself. Walk out the door with dignity. No one cares that you're mad. But they'll remember it and not in the way you want them to.
  2. Don't buy things you can't afford. This includes little things like shoes and dinners out. And big things like houses. Read the fine print. Live within your means. 
  3. Save money (as a corollary to not buying things you can't afford - see #2 above). Every pay check. It may only be $20 every two weeks when you first start working. But eventually it may be $500 or $1000. And then maybe you can buy those things that you want but couldn't afford when you were younger. Or... you can retire without fear! Or ... you can send your kids to college without them having to incur any debt! Or... you can breathe easy simply knowing your kids won't ever have to take care of you. 
  4. Don't live through your children. They are their own people. From the day they feel the rush of cold air on their little tiny bodies. They are ornery or calm or chatty or extroverted. They don't want what you want. They don't always like what you like. Give them time to develop an internal life, to be alone, and explore what they enjoy, what they are good at. 
  5. Dance and sing. A lot. Even if you suck at it. Do it at home alone when you've had a bad day. Or when you've had a good one. Do it with your kids. My kids love to dance with me to Madonna or Bruce Springsteen or Michael Jackson or Train or Lady Gaga. Or any old thing. I don't think I ever danced around the house with my mom. It's a beautiful thing to dance with your kids. Do it. They won't want to do it later. 
Alright. I think that is all the life advice I have. I think I'm writing it because I need to remember to take it myself. I'm going to turn on some music and dance now. 

Sunday, April 29, 2012

Enough already!

I've dated 3 men in the past year, only one for a significant period (5 months). That's really more than I've ever dated in my life. But it's time to take a little break. Which also means doing some assessing. Not just of the last year. But of my relationship life in general.

I realize that I have a tendency towards men who spare no time getting to the business of telling me what's wrong with me, what I should be doing differently. Whether they're nice about it or not is beside the point. Why do I lean towards men who do this? (Or do they all? I honestly don't know!) Is it back to the old (boring) standby - I'm used to being told what's wrong with me by ruthless, unsparing coaches? YAWN!!

As boring, redundant and annoying as this may be, I do think this might be it. I believe I deserve the criticism. Deep down, somewhere in my heart of hearts, I believe they're right to do it. Therefore it doesn't repel me. Though most women I know would high-tail it out the door before the second criticism passed his lips. I endure. Because I believe it's all true to some extent. And therefore deserved albeit annoying.

I tend to look passed faults, at first. If I find them, I push them aside in trying to be open. I so want to be open! I try to look at the whole person, even if one little bit is askew and doesn't fit with my ideal picture. I squint a little, I take it all in, see how it feels. After I've viewed the thing in it's entirety, I can decide if we can be complements to each other. If his outstanding qualities provide inspiration and uplift. If the less than outstanding ones are part of his humanity.

Maybe I should pay a little closer attention to these flaws sometimes known as 'red flags'. Things like no job. Or chronic underemployment. Or going at it in the sack like a horny and unskilled 17 year old. Or impatience. Quickness to anger. Petulance. An utter disconnection from reality. Bad breath. Or an inability to financially plan for one's future.

Still, amidst all of these, the biggest red flag, for me, in the future, will be the compulsion to tell me what I do wrong. That I work too much. That I do too much. That my job is easy so why on earth would I worry about it? That what I really need to do is take a year off (yeah that'll happen) so I can just "be". That I'm not affectionate enough. That I don't initiate sex enough or the right way. That I let my kids drink soda. And watch less than educational television. That my kids are too loud. That I'm too stressed and I pick my fingers too much. That I shouldn't go to therapy because, really, it's not a lifelong solution. What you really need is a women's group? (It's called friends, moron.) That I drink too much coffee and not enough water. And and and... are you done?

I know all of these things about myself. (Well, my job isn't easy but the others...I know!) I'm okay with them. Step off already.

Why do men think they have the right to do this? To pick and pick and pick? It's as if they are editing and re-arranging the pieces of the story before they've even read it all the way through - they don't even know if they like it, if it's any good and they want to change it up. Yes, if you've been with someone a long time and he is doing something inconsiderate, or you disagree about some childrearing issue or other, you have to discuss it, to compromise. But when you're dating, just starting out, don't you just have to take it all in? At first? And then, if you're married, don't you have to accept a person's foibles? Not beat him up too much, for being the guy you picked? I need to take this advice myself. Lord knows, I shot some daggers at the ex for simply being the guy he always had been.

Yet I sat mired in unspoken but keenly felt criticism for many years. I wanted too much. I was too competitive. I spent too much money. Or wanted to (so weird, I'm such a saver). I was fake and nice to people when I wasn't really so nice. I was too loud. Too stressed. Too anxious. Too everything.

And now, this feels uncomfortably normal to me. To be criticized is my set point.

I endured it because I felt I deserved it. I didn't adequately express my complaints because I felt unworthy to even have complaints. He was good. I was bad. If I were better, he wouldn't criticize. Period. The answer here is NOT that I should express more complaints. The answer is I should believe I am worthy of not being picked at. Of being appreciated as a too hard working, raggedy cuticled mom of soda drinking loud-mouthed kids.

Note to the next man who wants to date me: (1) pick up the check our first time out; (2) if we have fun - ask me out again before we say goodnight; (3) even if you're trying to be helpful, hold off on anything remotely critical for at least 6 months. Maybe longer. Maybe just hold off on it altogether. For the foreseeable future anyway. I've got enough self-reproach rattling around in my brain for the both of us. I promise.

Saturday, April 28, 2012

2012 Graduates... beware of commencement speeches

I read this little piece today and decided to come up with my own top ten list of "things they won't tell you in a commencement speech that you really need to know".  Okay class of 2012, here goes:

Me and my parents at my college graduation '92

  1. Don't worry too much about making a choice. Any choice. Who to date, where to work. Failing to make choices is usually worse than making one that isn't perfect. I know some folks who failed to choose anything at all in their twenties - a career, a mate, a passion - and they are stuck in never never land. Sometimes not making a choice means staying in school way longer than necessary. Sometimes it means waiting tables forever despite having a college degree. Sometimes it means staying in a destructive relationship. But if you don't choose something, you don't know if it can work. Choose something, try it. Switch directions if it doesn't pan out. But non-choices lead nowhere. 
  2. Say yes. A lot. Do stuff. Fun stuff. As much as possible. Adhere to your notions of fun, of course. Don't feel you have to adopt someone else's. But see music, go biking or hiking or climbing, make movies, drink with friends, travel. Do stuff. You'll be amazed how little time there is later. 
  3. Sleep around a little bit in your twenties. I mean don't be a complete slut. And certainly be safe. Maybe I should say "date" rather than sleep around. But I'm not big on euphemisms. You gotta see what's out there. Right? I never did this. Perhaps that's why I'm recommending it.
  4. Do things that scare you. At the very least, never let fear be a reason not to do something. Every time I've tackled something that scared the shit out of me, I was rewarded. And felt profound accomplishment and gratification. 
  5. Don't have kids too late. Don't have 'em too early either, for god's sake. But save yourself the panic and the medical expenses that come from waiting too too long. You'll never feel totally ready. It's ok. We know how to do this. It's what we're here for after all. 
  6. Speak another language. If you haven't learned one by the time you finish college, go do it. Don't be a lame-o American like me who works with Euros each of whom speak at least four languages. Don't be the ugly American. It's not fun. 
  7. Marry someone you think is remarkable. Not just nice. You won't regret it. Even if it doesn't work out. 
  8. It's not a race. It feels like it sometimes. And if you're competitive like me, you'll really want to win it. Even though there's no race to be won. But stop running, do what you love. Take your ego out of it all. It's hard. But it's possible. Though you will have to constantly remind yourself of this. Every time you put your ego in the middle of a decision, it will be a poor one. I swear it. 
  9. Get a good therapist. Don't go all the time. If you have to go constantly for years and years, you need a new one. He's not helping. But find one you trust, who helps facilitate a change in behavior or feeling or all of it. And doesn't just sit with you while you navel gaze. And then go in for tune ups when you need them. 
  10. It's gonna be hard. Harder than you think. All of it. Having babies, having toddlers, watching them grow up and leave you every single day. Being married, not being married. Watching friends move away. Not getting the job you wanted. Watching people get sick and not being able to do anything at all to help. But it's also going to be amazing. Remember the ebb and flow. And remember to breathe.


Sunday, April 22, 2012

Girls

I've been eagerly anticipating the new HBO show Girls by Lena Dunham, the 26 year old Wunderkind triple threat - Director, Actor, Writer. With one indie, South By Southwest winning film under her belt - Tiny Furniture - she got the deal of a lifetime. Judd Apatow, the outwardly schlemiel-ly but actually menschy mastermind of hilarious and undeniably entertaining films including 40 Year Old Virgin and Knocked Up, saw Tiny Furniture and sought her out. As the story goes. She was already working on the pilot for Girls and from there it was kismet.

I just watched the first episode a few days ago. I'm getting ready to watch the second tonight. It's been billed as a Sex In the City before they were Carrie, Samantha and those other two. When they were young and making terrible mistakes and not yet enjoying sex. Not yet glamorous rather, fumbling through their twenties, searching for jobs, searching for men and finding themselves in humiliating entanglements.  All of this is pretty true.

It is also a pitch perfect depiction of Millennials - that generation of confident, entitled, I'm here to save the world and become Mark Zuckerberg twenty-somethings that I've come across in the form of interns. And to be clear, not all twenty-somethings fit this description. Just as not all the young people (when I was young) met the definition of Gen-X: disillusioned, somewhat angry (at what?), counter culture grunge-loving, Kurt Cobain aficionados. Some of us did. But many went to work in law firms or consulting firms, went to business school and never went to Raves or got tattoos.

But there's a way that generations get defined by their distinctive-from-generations-past young people and the definition sticks. Of course, no generation is monolithic. But Millennials are known to be entitled and want the corner office the day after they start work in a sort of charmingly naive way. Not everyone can be Mark Zuckerberg, right? But it's sort of cute to think so. Before life sets you straight. (Cynicism = Gen X).

As the story goes, these Millennials need lots of praise because they've always gotten it - this is the generation of 'everyone gets a medal, no one loses!' As their Gen-X bosses who expected little and often opted out because we didn't even want the little we might come across, we find them difficult to manage. We are forced to take classes and read articles and books on how to manage them, in fact. Though I opted-in to corporate America I was squarely, definitively an X-er: cynical, skeptical of wanting what everyone had always wanted, tattoos. And now I find myself to be a curmudgeonly 'kids today' parody of fading generations before me, of the ilk who thought the next generation was going to be the end of us. I'm embarrassing myself.

So these Millennials? That's Girls. And I like it. The show, I mean. They are hurting and talented and can't figure it out. Which is, universally, what it is to be young. They are this crazy combination of over-confident, exceedingly entitled and desperately insecure. In the opening show, Hannah (Lena's character) is cut off by her parents after 2 years of being on the dole, post college. She's flabbergasted. She can't imagine why they'd do this when she's a burgeoning talent, a writer. The voice of her generation, potentially. Or "a voice of a generation" as she puts it. See, there's a hint of self-doubt in there - barely visible, but there.

I love the aspiration. Of the show. Of Hannah. And she's clearly not as sure of herself as she might want to be. She's awkward, sleeps with men who treat her terribly because she must think she doesn't quite deserve more. But what I'm not sure of, is do the creators, does Lena Dunham think this entitlement is an annoying characteristic of her generation or does she think it's justified - simply how they ought to be? It feels like she knows how annoying they can be. And at the same time loves them. She is them. But she isn't. Clearly in real life she is dedicated, hard-working, successful, ballsy, not living off her parents and very privileged. She didn't have to wait long for her big break so does she get that her life isn't what normally happens to people? I'm assuming she does. And that she's grateful.

There's part of me that wants to not like it because of the hype (I'm a Gen-Xer at heart) and the overnight sensation-ism of this not yet thirty year old. Having friends and family that have toiled for years as writers to not meet with nearly the success that she has without even seemingly having to try... well, it's hard not to want to hate it. But I don't.

I'd like it that much more if I knew that this generation sees this quality of entitlement as slightly annoying. A tic to be outgrown rather than a birthright. I'm not sure.


Saturday, April 14, 2012

A remarkable trip

I just got back from Europe. It was a whirlwind tour. Three cities in 5 days. Sounds fun. Mostly it was tiring and a lot of work. Traipsed through Barcelona visiting El Corte Ingles' - the premiere Spanish department store; hiked Munich, again, checking out department stores. And then in Brussels, I visited our corporate offices for a day of meetings. One day I'll visit Europe and see sites...surely there are other things to do besides check out Dockers and Tommy Hilfiger displays. Alas, I'm exceedingly familiar with the retail landscape across the continent.

I was lucky enough to "run into" a friend in Brussels. Not so coincidental, I suppose, though he lives in Australia and I live in San Francisco. He is also a long time Levi's employee and we've worked on many a project together across the seas. He was in Brussels for a different set of meetings; it would have been easy to have been in the same offices for a full day and not run into each other at all. But he heard someone mention my name and he came and sought me out in my windowless conference room. What a nice surprise!

I met him and his crew for dinner and we chatted animatedly while leaning into each other for most of the night, leaving others to speculate about us (he's straight) - I imagine. It's all very innocent. We're two old-timers in the land of newbies, connecting over old stories that no one remembers but us. I'm pretty sure a rumor or two started though.

After dinner we headed to the pub for a pint. He asked about my real life - not work life. He knows about my divorce, my dating travails. He said: don't settle, Jen. You must not settle.

I'll try. I'm trying.

You're a remarkable person. One of the most I've ever known. He said that.

Wow, I thought. "Remarkable" is such a lovely word. He used it to describe me. Me. It almost made me cry. I want someone that thinks I'm remarkable. I thought my ex was. I don't think he ever thought I was. Maybe he did. I'm not sure. But if he did, I certainly never knew it. And perhaps I didn't let him know I thought it either. But you have to think they are remarkable, and experience them as kind, and for both of those things to be reciprocated, for it to work. Both things, both ways are necessary.

I left with utter confidence, feeling as if I truly deserved for someone to think that of me. This felt like a revelation though I think some people always know that and expect it. Wow! I realized, I don't think I ever thought that before. I don't think I thought I deserved that. I thought - though never said aloud or even thought concretely - that what I deserved was for someone to make me work for their love. To prove myself worthy of it. To jump through hoops for a few scraps every now and again. Where does that come from? Such an astonishing realization at this point in one's life. To realize that I've never expected to be loved in that way.

And I also realized I need to find someone that I too think is remarkable. That astounds me with how he thinks, what he does, how he treats me. I deserve that. And I do believe, now that I've realized this - and felt it in my bones - that I will have it.


Saturday, April 7, 2012

Friends

I was just reading a piece in Vanity Fair about the "Friends" phenomenon. While I was never super into the show, it was pretty interesting to read about its humble beginnings. No real stars, seasoned writers who were used to seeing their share of failed pilots. They approached it like any other pilot. Maybe it will make it, maybe not. But they were passionate about the idea from the outset. It wasn't a fabricated concept like "what if an alien lived with this regular family?" or even "what if rich white people adopted two black kids"... it was intended to be about that time in your life when your friends are your family. When you hang out at the cafe, at the bar, telling stories about your day. When you spend holidays together, take vacations together, do pretty much everything together.

Reading about it and seeing it summarized took me back to my early days in San Francisco. I lived with a rotating group of girlfriends. We worked odd jobs, odd hours. We went out together, we ate together (whoever was home at whatever time one of us got home), we cooked together and we dyed our hair (constantly) together. I'd be lucky to spend as much time in a year with a friend now as I spent in just a few days with those ladies.

Later I moved just a few blocks away, and lived with a guy I didn't know all that well - a friend of a friend from Philadelphia. We had a rotating third roommate, and Philly guy's girlfriend basically lived with us as well. Those two introduced me to the man who would be my husband - and then ex husband. The four of us were inseparable. At this point we all had "regular" jobs, but it was never in question that we would eat dinner together every night, drink a few pints, go out on the weekends, staying up until the time I currently wake up on a Sunday morning.

My friends were my family. No doubt about it. If I got bad news at the doctor, I came home and told them. If I wanted to celebrate a promotion, we went out to the local bar, Chances, and drank too many IPAs. If we were bored, we also went to Chances, and maybe drank too many IPAs.

Somewhere around 30ish, the friends receded just a bit. I moved in with my boyfriend (the one that would become the husband), I got married, I had a baby. In a short period of time, seeing friends became a special activity to be planned weeks in advance, rather than a way of life. It didn't make the friends less important, just less constantly present. And the husband became the one to tell good news and bad news to first. Friends also transitioned over the years. I needed some who also had kids, to understand the plight of first time motherhood - the tears, the tiredness, the tantrums (mine, Virgil's, hubbie's). Some friends faded out, some stayed but more in the background. The college ones that I'd first lived with had spread out across the country, nonetheless, we were tied together with hefty everlasting rope. Even though I might only see them once a year. Or less.

And others - work friends, mom friends - became much more visible. I always thought the friends that "mattered" were those early friends. The ones that became friends when friends were your family. And they do. But somehow, along the way, new friends became tethered to me, to my life of today. They knew me, my strengths and weaknesses and turmoils, as an adult. One such friend, Steve, started out as a work acquaintance. Over the years, we worked more and more closely together. One night, in 2007, we found ourselves together in London. We were with a group, but we ditched them, and drank pints and ate steaks and talked books until midnight. We both loved Caroline Knapp's books "Drinking: A love story" and "Appetites". More importantly we both loved books. We knew the difference between "good books" and "bad books" (a few years later we both enjoyed - that's an understatement - "Twilight" and all the rest of 'em) but read both and took them for what they were. I consider that the evening we became friends.

A few years later, we ended up working even more closely together, on a team with its work cut out for it. It was a slog. We seemed to travel endlessly. We hit the hot spots in the U.S. including Little Rock, Dallas and Menomonee Falls. We also traipsed through Barcelona, Paris, London, Brussels, Instanbul and Munich and back again, several times over. Sounds glamorous and it felt that way at first, and then it got exhausting. A city a day for a week, walking endless city miles to visit department stores that all seemed to look the same after a while. That doesn't even sound like it could be part of someone's job but it is, when you market pants. We shared bottles of wine and beers and secrets. I was at the beginning of the end of my marriage and he listened while I talked and he shared his own ups and downs. He and his partner (yes he's gay making our friendship nothing to raise an eyebrow about) faced good times and bad in their 15 year plus relationship (a lifetime for the gays) and weathered every storm, admirably. He never judged or told me what to do. And when I decided what to do, he was there.

It's not a mushy friendship. We don't really hug. There's no heads on shoulders during crying jags. But I wouldn't have made it through without him. He always listened, he always called to check in, he always made me laugh. Working as closely as we did, 8 sometimes 10 hours a day together, it was like one of those friendships from my twenties. Where you literally spend all your time with each other. I spent more time with him than my husband (was that the problem?), my kids, anyone. Such is modern work life. That time spent, along with the experiencing of every emotion under the sun together from joy to despair to sheer exhausted frustration forges a friendship tethered by one of those everlasting ropes. Like Courney Cox and Jennifer Aniston, the alter egos of Monica and Rachel. These two seem to still be BFFs, providing shelter from the storms of divorce and rehab and bad reviews and stolen husbands. Even though they don't do the show "Friends" together anymore. They became friends who became family just like the characters on the show. (I can't believe I'm making this analogy to "Friends" a show I never really cared for... corny...but oh well.)

Such is Steve, for me, even though we weren't in our twenties when we met and we certainly aren't in our twenties now. It doesn't hurt that he thinks I'm funny ("you funny" he says), smart ("I would never want to have to debate you. No way") and generally great company. Back at ya.

All of this is a long windup to say that Steve is moving. To New York. And I hate it. I'll probably see him as much as I do now. If not more. We haven't worked together for a year. So we see each other for dinners about once every six weeks and talk on the phone through daily challenges or bigger life decisions. I go to NY regularly for work, he'll visit here no doubt. But I'm sad anyway. I know how it goes. He'll be tied to me but I'll reach for the phone less ... someone else closer by will fill the daily void (I hope!) ... and while we'll still be thick as thieves, we'll just have a different less constantly present kind of friendship. For now.

So long pal. I'll see you in June when I'm in NY. Don't forget to tug the rope once in a while.

Monday, April 2, 2012

Boger Update

A while ago I wrote about a man named Doug Boger who was the head coach at Flairs Gymnastics in the 1980's. A group of women who were competing back in my era came forward to USA Gymnastics (USAG) to report his abusive behaviors. He reportedly kicked, hit, choked and sexually abused young girls - these women (then girls) and others. The USAG dragged their feet but eventually banned him from the sport - he was coaching at a gym in Colorado up until very recently. It's hit the national news - USA Today and CNN amongst other outlets - have reported on it.


Doug Boger


USAG is still claiming there's not much more they can do other than ban him. I say: not so. How about changing the rules? Much more can be done to prevent future incidents as well as providing clear policies and procedures when abuse is suspected. How about making gym owners accountable for the behaviors of those coaches or other employees on their payroll? What if a club's gym membership was suspended for hiring an abuser or failing to act when reported abuse was happening to the girls training in the gym? What if the girls couldn't compete in USAG competitions if clubs failed to comply? USAG argues this punishes the girls - but doesn't training with a pedophile, risking the athletes' emotional and physical well-being, hurt them more? There are always other gyms to go to that will comply with the policies thus making it possible to compete (and train safely) if a club is banned from membership. Gyms should be required to report suspected abuse. It should not be left to discretion - clearly that isn't working. Gyms should sign up to do this upon becoming member clubs, in the name of athlete protection. This doesn't currently exist.

I'm not a lawyer. I don't know what's truly possible. But certainly, something akin to the above is feasible?

It's not asking for much really. Under various state laws, Pediatricians are required to report suspected abuse to officials lest they risk losing their licenses. If a school principal suspected abuse or was told of abuse by a teacher and did nothing - said "it's rumors" or "there's not enough proof" - there would be outrage (and probably some laws broken, depending on the state). There should by no means be a witch hunt, but there should be a proper investigation. These athletes should be provided the same protections they are provided in other areas of their lives - like in school, or at the doctor.

I know how insular that world can be. I came from it. It made sense to me then. I can tell you stories. Some of which were in my book; some of which were not. The boys coach in our gym was a legendary pedophile. He took advantage of those kids without strong parental presence. He was a world class coach (and a teacher). No one wanted to rock the boat. "It would ruin his life," was a common refrain by some parents. Like he ruined those kids' lives. I feel terribly that I didn't do something - though as a kid myself I followed the lead of the adults. If no one came forward maybe it wasn't that bad? He was eventually fired. But went on to open his own gym nearby and then, later, 'retired' abruptly under hazy circumstances and passed ownership of the gym on to one of his coaches. No one ever came forward to officially accuse him. He probably continued teaching in the school system. But who knows. In another instance, a young girl got up the gumption to tell her parents what was happening in the gym at the hands of one of her coaches. "Surely you've made a mistake," and they waved it off. It was a different time, people often say. Was it that different though?

Mr. Boger went on trial in the 1980's. His legal bills were footed by parents in the gym. He was staunchly defended. No one wanted to believe that their beloved coach - the guy who was gonna bring their daughters medals and Olympic team berths - was an abuser.

Boger with a gymnast in the '80s


We have an unhealthy belief in winners. This is not unique to sport. Winning = good = beyond reproach. He wins (or trains those who do) therefore he can't be that monster. Maybe he bends the rules a bit. But winners get to.  Just like Wall Streeters. They "win" money. They do harm. They go unpunished. Sound familiar?

Maybe it's time to develop a little less faith in winning. Not that we should instinctively distrust those who succeed. But they must not be beyond criticism - or viewed as beyond the law - simply BECAUSE they win.

In many cases, I'd argue, it's their winning that makes them believe they have the power to exist outside the rules. Their egotism may in fact prompt recklessness, illegal acts. In the same way it makes politicians do things like father babies with their "girlfriends" while their wives are dying, or tweet penis pictures, or troll for sex in airport bathrooms. Power corrupts, is the phrase. And while, to the outside world, it may not seem like gymnastics coaches are powerful, I can tell you, from inside, they hold all the cards.




Sunday, April 1, 2012

My Mini Happiness Project

I just finished reading a book called The Happiness Project by Gretchen Rubin. I generally don't subscribe to these "project-type" books. I'd put Eat, Pray, Love smack dab in the epicenter of this genre which I didn't particularly like. Though I do recognize its value and its raging popularity and I wouldn't dare suggest my opinion is somehow more right than most people's - I'm in the minority here. So perhaps I just didn't get it or relate to it.

There does seem to be a spate of 'project' books of late - I'll do something for a year to better myself and I'll regale you with all the ways I bettered myself and you can too! Generally they seem artificial, contrived to me. And the language a bit cloying and/or too self-helpy for my tastes. This one - The Happiness Project - goes so far as to equip the reader with the tools to start her own happiness project. Which I'm not going to do. Nonetheless I got some worthwhile snippets from the book. And even learned that I already do a lot to promote my own happiness. Ms. Rubin clearly states that everyone's happiness project is going to be different - we all have different things that make us happy. But there are some general principles to abide by... I'm not going to quote her directly. Here's my interpretation of some of the "general principles":


  1. Be yourself. Sounds like grade school pablum. But it's true. Know what you like, don't wish you liked other stuff (unless what you like somehow hurts people). And do more of it. And feel good about it.
  2. Act happy and you'll feel happy. It's true. Act poopy and you'll be a poop. Period.
  3. Working on your own happiness actually helps the world. If you're happy, you'll do more good deeds, be more generous. If you're blue, you'll do nothing. So it isn't selfish (or stupid) to be happy. 
  4. It's easier to be a Debbie Downer than the gal that sees the bright side. It takes work and awareness to be happy. 
  5. Dwelling on everyday problems doesn't help. Let it go. 
  6. Lighten up. Laugh at yourself.
  7. Give of yourself. Or "spend out" as she calls it. Don't give with wanting something in return. Give because it makes people happy. And it makes you happy to make them happy. And on it goes. 
  8. Get lots of rest.
  9. Exercise.
  10. Be nice.
  11. Don't keep score.

Ok she had others. But these ones resonated with me because I've been practicing them unwittingly. I give myself pretty high marks on these. I can do better on "let it go". I get sad sometimes. Not about silly stuff. About real stuff. But stuff I can't do anything about. And the fact is, my life is good. I'm healthy. My kids are healthy and kind and humble. My family is loving and supportive. I've got a great job that I really love that more than affords me the things I want to do. I work with smart, fun people that I enjoy being around even if many of them are moving on to other things. And I have a "hobby" (writing) that I also love. I'm not in a relationship. I don't have an obvious emergency contact. So what! I come to my own rescue all the time. And I've got lots of friends willing to step in in a crunch. Lucky girl is me. 

She points out throughout the book that she didn't write it because she was particularly UN-happy. (I suspect that part of the reason she wrote it is that she noticed a trend in project books and she had an idea for one that she sold... but that's cynical and not particularly nice but I'd do it too if I could think of a good project book!) She simply thought she could be happier. And can't we all.

This is my list of very practical things that I will do in the coming months to be even happier. 

  1. Write a book (working on it).
  2. Actively blog (doing it now).
  3. Be positive, don't criticize (easy at work, harder outside... I can do it).
  4. Spend money on things that make me happy - trips with my kids.
  5. Spend money without worrying or feeling guilty.
  6. Don't react to negativity.
  7. Validate my kids feelings when they're being pains in the butt. It diffuses conflict - related to point 6 above.
  8. Exercise (working on it - keep it up!)
  9. Be me / know my character - do more of what I love, don't feel badly about what I like, want, need (even bad TV on occasion).
  10. If I think someone else requires or deserves some sort of generosity, or kindness (I worry a lot about the people that work for me, for instance - and try to think of ways to make sure they always feel appreciated and heard) - then so do I. I generally think I can do without the things I think others need or deserve. Not so. 
  11. Don't fret (I've been getting pretty good at this but I need to keep at it).
  12. Date if it happens, but don't worry about it too much.
  13. Sometimes...don't make the bed!
So there's my list. It is not an official "project". There are no timelines to be met. No solemn commitments. Just this reminder that I can consult if and when I fall off the happy.

Friday, March 30, 2012

Hippos and zebras and penises, oh my!

I'm on a short vacation with my kids in San Diego. We are staying at a fancy schmancy hotel/resort. And I love it. Without guilt. Yesterday I hung out at the pool with the kids and saw an old friend from high school whom I haven't seen in more than twenty years. See Colleen and me with her daughter Claire here below.



Why Colleen befriended me more than 20 years ago I have no idea. She was cool. I was not. I was painfully shy, I don't think I spoke to anyone at all, in my third high school in less than 3 years. But she took me in for some reason and somehow made me into a little less of a dork. I'm pretty sure her friendship scored me a boyfriend. And it certainly made high school more fun - I went to prom (and drank whiskey), I had people to eat lunch with (I didn't eat but it was better not to sit alone) and I had plans on Friday nights - I was the designated driver when we trolled the streets of Allentown looking for parties while listening to Yaz. Woo hoo! The shyest dork on earth ended up having a little fun, all thanks to Colleeen and her siblings (she had no fewer than a gazillion Irish Catholic brothers and sisters) and her welcoming friends.

Today, I took the kids to the San Diego Zoo. I hate driving around in places I don't know. But I dealt. And we went to the Zoo. I am almost embarrassed to say it but I had moments of near transcendence with my kids at the zoo today. Just moments of pure, unadulterated appreciation. And joy. So grateful to be there with them. To have them be kind to each other. And to laugh.

When we came upon the hippos, Virgil was ecstatic. I love having kids that are young enough to still be super psyched about hippos. Virgil screamed: "Hippos are cool!" Wyatt would not let him have the last word.

"You know what else is cool?!" No. "My mom." I swear I'm not making this up. He was excited to be there, to be together. He was having fun. And he was grateful. This was after a morning of bickering that resulted in Wyatt throwing Virgil's toothbrush on the floor and stomping on it. Crushing it under the heel of his Adidas cap toes. He smashed that plastic green toothbrush because Virgil was giving him shit about not remembering to bring his own. We went from full on sibling battle with tears and breaking things, to a love fest over hippos and mom.

Later, we were looking at zebras. Here is what we saw:



Yes that is a giant zebra penis. It was shocking, to say the least. The weirdest part is none of the other zebras had quite such a display. The others all had normal (or what I'd expect "normal" to be) zebra appendages. This guy was a stud. It kept growing, getting bigger, and then oddly, getting smaller. Sometimes it came down past what I'd call his "knee". You'd turn around for a moment and it would shrink up to match those of his friends. The kids could not stop giggling. Nor could I for that matter.

Virgil said: "Zebras should wear pants, mom." Not sure that would help. This thing was like a third leg. Wyatt said: "He must attract the ladies." He must. But why would an 8 year old know anything about that? So much for my parenting skills. My 8 year old son thinks all that matters is dick size. It's not irrelevant, but why does he even have a point of view here?

So the zoo was fun. And then I got to meet up with my brother and his kids and wife later at the hotel. What more could a girl want in a day.

It was perfect.




Tuesday, March 27, 2012

Who you gonna call?

I find myself in this strange place in my life right now where I have a full life, lots of friends, great job, writing a lot... but no one to rely on. Except myself. I have dear friends - close friends who I'd do anything for and who'd do anything for me - but they don't live here in San Francisco anymore. My brother lives in Los Angeles. So while he'd certainly do anything for me (and did in the last year as I needed his help more than ever), he's a 7 hour drive away. If I'm in trouble, I need someone closer.

I've been at Levi's 13 years. I've been through my share of friend cycles there. And I find myself now, somewhat alone. My besties have left for greener pastures. Apple, Sephora, Converse. My old standbys have left as well. I'm in the throes of finding new compadres but the shut the door, say anything, keep a secret kind of friend - well, they're not there right now. Which doesn't mean I don't have plenty of people to eat lunch with, share a laugh with, have a drink with. I do. But what I need is a tad bigger than that.

I went to the doctor last week and had to fill in new forms. I was stopped dead in my tracks around the "emergency contact" line. It should be someone local. Hmmm. Should be someone that will show up. Hmmm. Should be someone I wouldn't feel too too badly for if I had to call them in the middle of the night. I don't ask much of people. So if you rank as someone I'd call in the middle of the night - say if I'm in labor - well, we're sistahs. With my brother gone, my college friends (the ones you'd lay down your life for kind of friends) all dispersed around the country, my parents in Pennsylvania, well - I didn't know who to put down. I found myself wishing I lived near my parents. Hmmm. I ended up picking my ex. He might be the last person I'd want to call. But he'd show up. If only because he'd need to bring the kids. And he might think he got the call because I forgot to update the form post divorce, so he probably wouldn't even be mad.

But I need a better answer. My gal S provided it tonight over dinner. She said: I have no family here either. Hubbie and I need help sometimes. If a kid is sick, or we just have some sort of crisis. Will you help? Yes. Then I'll help you. Give me your phone tree. I'll call your mom. I'm your girl. I love you. You're like my big sister. Now hand over the emergency digits.

Love that girl.

Sunday, March 25, 2012

The Hunger Games

I took my kids to see The Hunger Games yesterday. I think I may have been more excited to see it than they were, even though my oldest read the books so fast he practically ate them. This won't be a review, though I did love the movie. It's more of a musing about why I like the story so much. And for me, it comes down to character development. While the characters in young adult books are generally pretty black and white depictions - it seems to me that "obvious" is the rule in "YA", nuance not part of the program - Katniss seems to have her gray areas. Or at least contradictions. She's complicated! Yes she's tough. Yes she's pretty pissed. Yes she's fiercely protective of her family, primarily her little sister, Prim. These are the notes she generally strikes. She's a stoic competitor having been raised in the darkest of circumstances in District 12 (the coal mining district), having lost her father as a young girl, and having stepped into take care of the family when her mom had a breakdown.

But she's a stoic who knows she isn't really all that tough. She weeps uncontrollably when Rue is lost to the Games. She orders her mother not to cry or fall apart after the Reaping, though she herself can't stop shaking. She falls into Peeta's affection and comfort though she'd never ask for it. I like this gal. And yes, I can relate. I've been called a "stoic" as well, by former gymnasts from my competing days. I was surprised by this assessment of my carriage during competition, during training. I felt like a mess, one step away from falling apart at all times. But I suppose I held it together. Through injuries, through disappointments, through losses. I learned the stoic's demeanor at a young age. Weakness in the gym, amongst competitors, got you no where. And I suppose Katniss feels the same way.

Will she accept kindness when it is offered? Surely. Will she ask for it... no way. But that is the lesson in adulthood - for me. To be willing to ask for help. To be willing to fall apart a little. Or a lot, if that is where it goes. Being a divorced mother of two doesn't help here really. Not a ton of places to go to ask for help. It's reinforcing my inclination towards stoicism as I actively try to unlearn these behaviors. It's a quandary, no doubt.

But back to the movie. I like Katniss. I relate to her. And Jennifer Lawrence played a mean Katniss. She's not too perfect looking. She's pretty but not preciously so. Yes she's older than the Katniss in the books but I'm not sure it matters. I suppose the weight of being the family caretaker is that much more intense when Katniss is fifteen as she is in the book. Whereas Jennifer Lawrence (not sure how old she is) reads more like 20. But her situation is still rough. She's had to volunteer for the Games to protect Prim! The Games are a fight to the death to pay penance and/or homage to a dastardly government who supposedly protects it's citizens from deathly uprisings. Someone a little older - and twenty isn't exactly old - brings some gravitas to the part. Worked for me, though I know some folks are a little riled up over it. Simmer down, it is just a movie. There is some license taken when translating a book into a movie. This worked in my humble opinion.

Elizabeth Banks as Effie. Loved. Lennie Kravitz as Cinna - worked for me, though I pictured Cinna way gay-er in the book. I pictured him as an over the top hair stylist, with Queer Eye for the Straight Gal flamboyance. But Lennie brought some dignity to the role, even with the gold eyeliner. And Josh Hutcherson as Peeta? Worked for me! Sweet, empathetic, kind but not useless. Strong, protective. Honorable. Woody as Haymitch? He treated Haymitch with a tad more kindness and dignity than the book conveyed. He clearly drank too much in the movie but he didn't come across as an angry, hopeless drunk. He kinda had it together. His heart still a bit more in tact than it seemingly was on the printed page. I wouldn't have minded a bit more darkness in that character. Rue - darling. Heartbreaking. How did I have no idea that she was black from the books? That the black people all came from District 11? I missed that racial commentary somehow.

So there. I liked everyone. I liked it all. Can't wait for the next one. And yes I'm a little too into the whole thing. But not really. It's fun to get swept up every once in a while though.

Single

I am once again single. I am no longer dating the nice man with three kids. It lasted 5 months, which I'm told is kind of the hurdle point for grown up adult daters. We didn't make it past that hurdle. It was me who called it. It wasn't easy. He was kind and giving and fun. But there were too many other things that didn't feel right, for me. I felt pressured into being a way that I am not. In the past I would've adapted my behaviors to the other's wants. That is my weakness, as a pleaser. I know I can't do that now. There were other divides - in what we want from a relationship. In how we communicate. In our geographies. In what we enjoy doing and how we expect the other to participate in that. And on. Not that divides aren't over-come-able. They are. But, for me, these were not. I knew it. And so I told him. And I feel terribly. I have to get used to believing that my feelings and perceptions are valid - I'm used to invalidating them in favor of the other party's, in a relationship, in a friendship, in any sort of situation at all.

I feel badly because I know he's sad and wanted to continue to try. And I hate making people feel sad. But if we'd have continued I would have been sad. So that isn't the answer.

Some might say: Jen, you just aren't ready for a real relationship. Maybe. But I don't think that's it. I'm 43. I know myself. After the last year of soul searching, I really think I know myself quite well. This wasn't it. I explored it. I learned a lot. I am grateful. But I was feeling crowded by what he needed (which he deserves) and how he communicated it. What he wants is utterly valid, it just isn't something I can provide.

And on we go.

I love what you showed me. And I wish you all that you want. And all that you deserve. And I'm sorry.

Thursday, March 22, 2012

Stress Rejection

Just a few years ago, I was prone to be stressed out about work. (Now ... I was probably pretty anxious in general. Home life - eh. Pouring my life into the non-stop turmoil of work, wading through the quagmires and feeling triumphant, heroic! at the end... that felt good.) But I seem to do the opposite now. When the anxiety amongst others rises, I go to a calm and happy place. Maybe it's years of angst underneath my belt and finally realizing that freaking out simply never helps the situation. It's not like you work better. Or faster. Or somehow see the answers more clearly. Nope. Your brain fuzzes over and your heart beats too fast and you make mistakes. It can be an addictive feeling - the adrenaline buzz of STRESS!!!!! But I think I may have finally kicked the habit.

Maybe I just realized real life provides enough hurdles and seemingly unsolvable challenges, that work just isn't worth a freak out.

I go into calm mommy mode when everyone starts to lose it. Then they get more frustrated with me. Trying to convince me that I just don't understand. If I understood, I would surely be this freaked out too. Of course! Come join me in this mess and stress and angst because it really is crazy right nowandwe'renotgonnamakeitthroughthiscan'tyousee!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

No, I get it. But I'm gonna stay here. My body rejects the anxiety. My brain can't handle the speed. My heart wants to beat at a normal pace. And maybe, if I stay calm, I'll find a way out of whatever mess we find ourselves in at this particular moment. Or I won't. And it will be ok too.

But it feels better to quiet the mind rather than run endless laps around the problem. One calm lap. And a little progress is generally made. And then it doesn't seem quite so dire after all.

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

Starting New Stuff

Despite my eldest's magical insight - the reason you can't start writing that book MOM is that you don't want to write THAT book. Write something else - I started the book. I had every intention of abandoning the effort. Of telling my agent (I feel weird saying that - but that is what she is) that I just can't do it. Despite the request from a well regarded publisher, I'm laming out. Not gonna happen. Forgive me. I can't find my mojo.

And then I got on the stair master. Something I'm trying to do more of lately. The thing that has fallen by the wayside more than anything in the last 18 months is exercise. I suppose maybe I've exercised enough in my lifetime to not ever exercise again (though my expanding waistline and widening ass would disagree). Or that's what I tell myself anyway, when I don't feel like exercising. Which is always lately.

It actually started - this whole not exercising thing - before the last 18 months which shall be called "the extrication of a marriage". It started way before that if I'm truthful. It began to wane aggressively in late 2009. When I started the job I currently hold at Levi's. Job was hard. I sat in the chair and worked. Period. And then I had to have ankle surgery. A perfect excuse not to exercise! It took me a while to walk without pain (not that I couldn't have ridden a bike) and so I sat. And then I never got my ass back into the swing again.

The whole divorce thing didn't help. Rather than sweat my troubles away, I drank wine. And the kid schedule got complicated blah blah blah - it was just easier not to move my body. And then I just started to feel bad. Icky. Gross. Sloth-y.

The good news is that all those years of gym-ing means I get back in shape pretty darned fast. Faster than the everyday normal human. I suppose my baseline level of fitness is quite high from all the years of running, jumping, flinging and hand standing. Still it sucks to get started. Hauling your butt onto the treadmill when it has been so cozy on the couch or in an office chair for so long is no fun. Until you realize you feel better afterwards than you would have if you'd spent that same amount of time reclining. Funny how that works.

This time I'm being patient with myself. Lenient, if you will. If I can only go for 30 minutes to the gym, so be it. It's better than zero minutes. (In the past if I couldn't go whole hog, I just didn't go at all.) The new Jen is all about moderation (hah...if you know me AT ALL that will make you do a spit take.)

So I climbed on the stair master last night after a long day of work. And magically, as the sweat flowed, the words kind of came to me. Not too many. But at least a first chapter's worth. Hannah Gates is our heroine. At least for now. Names change so we'll see. I've never attempted to write fiction before. I'm shit at story and structure so this could be a total disaster. But now that I've begun, I've got some momentum. And I kind of like Hannah. And I want to see what happens to her.

Saturday, March 17, 2012

Lazy Days

I did less today than maybe I've ever done in a day. Without having been in a hospital bed or a cast or something. The kids had a friend over - two actually, twins - and they played and I hung out in my room reading the paper, reading a book, dozing. I NEVER nap. Never. Kind of nice. I also got some stuff organized. Papers and the like. Nothing more satisfying that being organized, for me anyway.

I have an odd relationship with relaxing. I don't like it particularly. I have to force myself to do it. Makes me feel guilty. But today I kind of felt proud of myself. I left the kids to their own devices, let them do their thing, while I did mine.

I'd meant to write some chapters of this young adult book I've been propositioned to write. Once again, I failed. Couldn't do it.

I was bemoaning my laziness over dinner with my kids. "I just can't get this thing started," I said. "Why? Why can't I just do this? Am I lazy?" (I know this is ridiculous. I say I did nothing. And yet, I cleaned the house, grocery shopped, paid the bills, read the NYT, made a nice dinner of salmon & kale & rice pilaf. I'm a kook. With a capital K. In my head I know I'm not lazy. In my heart, I always worry/wonder.)

"I don't think that's it, mom. You're not lazy," said my oldest. This was on the heels of a conversation a few days ago about how men are lazy and women's aren't, according to Virgil. A subject he raised. I was torn about agreeing with him. I think there's some truth to it - my pride in the female work ethic rearing it's occasionally ugly feminist head; though certainly men aren't consistently lazy, they just like relaxing more than women, I think. The being torn comes because I certainly don't want to impugn the male gender to my two sons...hmmm what to do? Hell, he brought it up!

I'm not?

No.

Then why can't I get this started?

You don't want to write this book. Write something else.

And thus, the wisdom of our children guides us. Smart kid. And he's only 11. Imagine...

The Power of Love

Last night I went to dinner with a friend from work who lives in Europe. He's here in SF for a few weeks working and probably doesn't want to sit alone on a weekend evening (nor do I) so I figured, why not! He's not been a close friend in the past but I like the guy... not such a bad way to spend an evening.

A few glasses of wine and we started talking about relationships. He's about my age (29!) and he's not married but has been with the same woman for over 20 years and they have two kids. One is fully grown and in graduate school (proud poppa) and the other is a wee eight year old. They are unconventional this couple. But it seems to work. Over twenty years ain't bad.

He asked me about my dating life and offered some advice. Uh-oh. He said: in every relationship one person loves the other a little bit more. Yikes. Not too much more. There can't be a huge gap or it won't work. But it's true. And the one that loves a little less holds a bit more power. They get to make more of the choices. 


Ok I didn't like the sound of this. But he continued. And he's not some weirdo power hungry, heartless dude. Much to the contrary - he's a super nice guy, adores his kids. Laughs easy. Respectful of everyone.

I asked him: Who loves who more in your relationship? Without pause he said his girlfriend loved him more. (I think he means: she puts up with more shit). But... I love her. I will never find someone I can be as happy with. As compatible with. Or have such great sex with (he added earnestly). Ok we're getting to be better friends.

He continued: next time, you should be the one who gets to be with someone who loves you a little more. You've done it the other way. I furrowed my brow, about to protest, then realized he was right. Just from how you describe your marriage, you were willing to do anything. To try anything. He had limits. True. He's right. I loved more. I think. Not sure what the ex would say.

Don't you think it can ever be even? No. He didn't waver.

I thought about my friends, my family, the relationship I'd embarked on since my divorce. The other relationships I know. My brother. It seems even with my brother. Then I thought about it further. Maybe not. But it's just a hair tilted, if at all. (Not gonna say which way!)

So it's one view. I get why he'd offer this advice and recommend going the way of the one in more control. Perhaps you avoid some heartbreak. I can't do heartbreak again. But I'm not sure I'm built this way. I think I may be built to be the one that gives up the power. I think that may be what love feels like to me. But that's a fucked up story for another day...

Or maybe he's just wrong. And the love that works best is perfectly even. Give and take. Each willing to give up something for the other. The balance working itself out over years, not weeks or months. A dance where one leads and the other follows but it gets switched up over time depending on who can handle what at the time. I'd like to think this is what's in store.